.: ARTIGOS
.: REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
-
Sthella M.M.Regadas e Lucia C.C.Oliveira: Fundamentos da Ultra-sonografia Anorretal. Editora Revinter, Rio de Janeiro, 2004.
- Donald
O. Castell, June A. Castell: Esophageal Motility Testing. Appleton &
Lange Ed., Norwalk, Connecticut, 1994.
- Richter
JE. Ambulatory Esophageal pH Monitoring: Practical Aprroach and Clinical
Applications. Igaku-Shoin, New York - Tokio, 1991.
- Castro
LP, Savassi-Rocha PR, Melo JRC, Costa MM: Tópicos em Gastroenterologia
10 - Deglutição e Disfagia, Editora Medsi, Rio de Janeiro,
2000.
- Cedric
G. Bremner, Tom R. De Meester, Ross Macrae Bremner, Rodney J. Mason.
Esophageal Motility Testing, Quality Medical Publishing, Inc. St. Louis,
Missouri, 2001.
- Ary
Nasi e Nelson H. Michelsonh. Avaliação Funcional do Esôfago:
Manometria e pH-metria Esofágicas, Editora Roca, São Paulo,
2001.
- Mara
Salum e Raul Cutait. Avaliação Funcional em coloproctologia,
Editora Reichmann, 2004
- Rimon
Azzam. Capítulos "Distúrbios da Deglutição"
e "Distúrbios Motores Primários e Secundários
do Esôfago" do livro "Tratado de Endoscopia Digestiva
Diagnóstica e Terapêutica Esôfago Volume
1", do Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal e Broncoesofagoscopia
do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP, Editora Atheneu, 1999.
- Rimon
Azzam. Capítulo "Distúrbios Motores do Estômago
e Duodeno" do livro "Tratado de Endoscopia Digestiva Diagnóstica
e Terapêutica Estômago e Duodeno Volume 2",
do Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal e Broncoesofagoscopia
do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP, Editora Atheneu, 2001.
- Moraes-Filho JPP, Cecconello I, Gama-Rodrigues J et cols. Brazilian consensus on gastroesophageal reflux disease: proposals for assessment, classification and management. The Americam Journal of Gastroenterology 2002; 97:241-248.
-
Sonnenberg A, El-Serag HB. Clinical epidemiology and natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1999; 72(2-3):81-9.
-
Moraes-Filho JPP, Chinzon D, Eisig JN et. cols. Prevalence of heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease in the urbab Brazilian population. Gastroenterology 2003, 124S:A-166.
-
Nasi A, Moraes-Filho JPP, Zilberstein, B et cols. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical, endioscopic and intraluminal esophageal pH monitoring evaluation. Diseases of the esophagus; 14: 41-9, 2001
-
Moss SF, Arnold R, Tytgat GNJ et cols. Consensus statement for Management of gastroesophageala reflux disease. Result of worshop meeting at Yale University School of Medicine. J Clin Gastroenterol 1998, 27:6-12.
-
Dent J, Brun J, Frendrick AM et cols. An evidence based appisal of reflux disease management. The Genval Worshop report. Gut 1999, 44 (Suppl):S1-S16.
-
Devault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol 1999, 6:1434-1442.
-
Numans ME, Lau J, de Wit NJ, Bonis PA. Short-term treatment with proton-pum inhibitors as a test for gastroesofageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test characteristics. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140(7):518-527.
-
Cremonini F, Di Caro S, Delagado-Aros S, Sepulveda A, Gasbarrini G, Gasbarrini A, Camilleri M. Meta-analysis: the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004, 19(1):145.
-
Christopher G, Streets MRCS, DeMeester TR. Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: why, when and what to do? J Clin Gastroenterol 2003, 37(1):14-22.
-
American Gastroenterological Association (no authors listed). Technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 2005;128:209-224.
-
Tutuian R, Castell DO. Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 2004; 2:230-236.
-
Sifrim D, Castell DO, Dent J et cols. Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut 2004; 1024-1031.
-
Shay S, Tutuian R, Sifrim D et cols. Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pHmonitoring: A multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99:1037-1043.
-
Tutuian R, Castell DO. Use of multichannel intraluminal impedance to document proximal esophageal and pharyngeal nonacid reflux episodes. Am J Med 2003, 115(3A):119S-123S.
-
Torquati A, Lutfi R et. cols. Laparoscopic fundoplication: is it worthwhile in patients with persistent GERD symptoms despite PPI therapy? DDW 2004
-
De Vault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the treatment of gatroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100(1):190-200.
-
Chiba N, De Gara CJ, Wilkinson Jm, Hunt RH. Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 1997, 112:1798-1810.
-
Katelaris P, Holloway R, Talley N et al. Digestive Health Foundation of Gastroenterological Society of Australia. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in adults: guidelines for clinicians. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002, 17:825-833.
-
Bardhan KD. Reflux rising – a burning issue! A personal overview of treatment. Research and Clinical Forums 1998;20:27-32.
-
Orlando RC. Why is the high-grade inhibition of gastric acid secretion afforded by proton pump inhibitors often required for healing of reflux esophagitis? Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:1692-1696.
-
Van Pinxteren B, Numanas ME, Bonis PA, Lau J. Short-term treatment with proton-pum inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease. (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2005. Oxford: Update Software.
-
Caro JJ, Salas M, Ward A. Healing and relapses rates in gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with the newer proton-pump inhibitors lansoprazole, rabeprazole, and pantoprazole compared with omeprazole, ranitidine and placebo: evidence from randomized clinical trials. Clinical Therapeutics 2001;23(7):998-1017.
-
Katz PO. Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: use of algorithms to aid in management. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:S3-S10.
-
Sandmark S, Carlsson R, Lundell L. Omeprazole or ranitidine in the treatment of reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988;23:625-632.
-
Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Festen HPM et cols. Long-term treatment with omeprazole for refractory reflux esophagitis: efficacy and safety. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:161-167.
-
Donnellan C, Sharma N, Preston C, Moayyedi P. Medical treatments for the maintenance therapy of reflux oesophagitis and endoscopic negative reflux disease (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2005. Oxford: Update Software.
-
Vela MF, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, et. al. Intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 2001; 120:1599-1606.
-
Shay S, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, Vela M et al. Twenty-four hour impedance and pH-monitoring in the evaluation of GERD patients with persistent symptoms despite BID proton pump inhibitors: a multicenter study. DDW 2004
-
SAGES guidelines (no authors listed). Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 1998, 12: 186-188.
-
Allgood PC, Bachmann M. Medical or surgital treatment for chronic gastroesophageal reflux? A systematic review of published evidence of effectiveness. Eur J Surg 2000, 166(9):713-721.
-
Corey KE, Schmitz SM, Shaheen NJ. Does a surgical antireflux procedure decrease the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus? A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2003, 98(11):2341-2342.
-
Sontag SJ, O’Connell S, Khandelwal S et cols. Most astmatics have gastroesophageal reflux with or without bronchodilator therapy. Alimentary Tract 1990;99:613-620.
-
Simpson WG. Gastroesophageal reflux and asthma. Archives of Internal Medicine 1995; 155:798-803.
-
Karilas PJ. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. JAMA 1996;276(12):983-988.
-
Winter DC, Brennan NJ, O’Sullivan G. Reflux induced respiratory disorders. Journal of the Irish Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons 1997;26(3):202-210.
-
Choy D, Leung R. Gastro-oesophageal reflux and asthma. Respiratory 1997;2:163-168.
-
Field Sk, Sutherland LR. Does medical therapy improve asthma in asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux: a critical review of the literature. Chest 1998;114:275-283.
-
Field SK, Gelfand GA, McFadden SD. The effects of antireflux surgery on asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux. Chest 1999, 116(3):766-774.
-
Gibson PG, Henry PL, Coughlan JL. Gastro-oesophageal reflux treatment for asthma in adults and children (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2005. Oxford: Update Software.
-
Catarci M, Gentileschi P, Papi C, Carrara A, Marrese R, Gaspari AL, Grassi GB. Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication. Ann Surg 2004, 239(3):325-337.
-
Johnson DA. Endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2004, 50(3):239-251.
| Avaliação prospectiva do valor dos métodos de fisiologia ano-retal no manejo da incontinência anal.
A prospective evaluation of the value of anorectal physiology in the management of fecal incontinence.
Harry Liberman, Julio Faria, Charles Ternent, garnet j,blatchford, Mark A.Christiansen, Alan G.Thorson.
Diseases Colon Rectum 2001; 44:1567-1574.
Os autores avaliaram prospectivamente um grupo de 90 pacientes incontinentes (84 sexo feminino) encaminhados para tratamento.
Inicialmente foram submetidas a avaliação clínica e exame físico, resultando em indicação de tratamento clínico (n= 45) ou cirúrgico ( n=45). Em seguida todos os pacientes foram encaminhados para avaliação fisiológica através de : manometria ano-retal de perfusão, ultra-sonografia de canal anal com transdutor de 360 graus e tempo de latência do nervo pudendo.
Finalmente, um painel de colo-proctologistas especialistas em fisiologia revisaram os dados clínicos e fisiológicos de todos os pacientes chegando-se então a um consenso sobre a melhor opção terapêutica.
Observaram então que a adição dos métodos de fisiologia ao exame clínico modificou o manejo dos pacientes em 10% dos casos.
No grupo com indicação clínica pré-teste a adição dos testes indicou tratamento cirúrgico em 5 pacientes (11%), principalmente pela detecção ultra-sonográfica de defeitos musculares.
No grupo com indicação cirúrgica pré-teste , em 3 pacientes (7%) a indicação passou a ser clínica e em 1 paciente alterou-se a indicação cirúrgica de esfincteroplastia para procedimento de transposição muscular. Nesses 3 pacientes a ultra-sonografia afastou a presença de um defeito esfincteriano.
De um modo geral, 27 dos 90 pacientes estudados (30%) obtiveram resultados anormais através dos métodos de fisiologia. Um terço dos pacientes apresentaram prolongamento do tempo de latência do pudendo. Defeitos esfincterianos ao ultra-som foram detectados em 52 pacientes (87%) , sendo que em 45 casos, a origem era causa obstétrica (87%) e em 7 pacientes devido a cirurgias ano-retais prévias( 13%).
Os pacientes cuja avaliação fisiológica alterou seus planos terapêuticos para tratamento cirúrgico constituiam um grupo mais jovem , com menor graduação de incontinência e com menor intervalo entre o último parto vaginal e a realização dos testes.
Baseados nesses resultados , os autores concluiram que a utilização dos métodos de fisiologia, especialmente a ultra-sonografia do canal anal, pode auxiliar significativamente o manejo dos pacientes incontinentes, embora a avaliação clínica de um colo-proctologista experiente seja também confiável. |
| ^ |
|
| The
influence of rapid food intake on postprandial reflux: studies
in healthy volunteers.
Wildi
SM, Tutuian R, Castell DO.
Digestive
Disease Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston,
South Carolina.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1645-51.
BACKGROUND:
The postprandial increase of gastroesophageal reflux (GER)
results largely from an increase in the rate of transient
lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs). Gastric distension
is believed to be the most important contributing factor.
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of rapid
food intake on GER in healthy volunteers using combined multichannel
intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) testing to record both
acid and nonacid reflux. Our hypothesis was that rapid food
intake overstresses the gastric pressure-volume response and
contributes to increased postprandial GER. METHODS: Twenty
healthy volunteers were included in the study. On two separate
days the participants were asked to eat the same standard
meal within 5 or 30 min in random order. Acid and nonacid
reflux episodes were recorded over a 2-h postprandial period.
RESULTS: Intake of a standard meal within 5 min was associated
with more reflux episodes (median = 14) than an intake within
30 min (median = 10, p= 0.021). The increase was confined
to the first postprandial hour and was caused predominantly
by an increase of nonacid reflux. During the entire 2-h postprandial
period, 469 reflux episodes were noted in the 40 studies.
During the first postprandial hour 45% (135/303) of reflux
events were nonacid as opposed to 22% (37/166) noted during
the second hour (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Since rapid food
intake produces more GER in healthy volunteers, studies in
GERD patients are warranted to evaluate if eating slowly may
represent another "life-style modification" aimed
at reducing GER. (Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1645-1651)
|
|
| |
| ^ |
| |
| Combined
multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry clarifies esophageal
function abnormalities: study in 350 patients.
Tutuian
R, Castell DO.
Division
of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina,
South Carolina 29425, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1011-9.
BACKGROUND:
Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry
(MII-EM) is a technique that uses an FDA-approved device allowing
simultaneous evaluation of bolus transit (MII) in relation to pressure
changes (EM). METHODS: During a 9-month period, beginning from July
2002 through March 2003, we prospectively performed combined MII-EM
on all patients referred for esophageal function testing. Each patient
received 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows. Manometric findings
were reported based on criteria described by Spechler and Castell
for liquid swallows. MII findings were reported as having normal
bolus transit if >/=80% (8/10) of liquid and >/=70% (7/10)
of viscous swallows had complete bolus transit. RESULTS: Three-hundred
fifty studies were evaluated from patients with a variety of symptoms
having the following manometric diagnoses: normal manometry (125),
achalasia (24), scleroderma (4), ineffective esophageal motility
(IEM) (71), distal esophageal spasm (DES) (33), nutcracker esophagus
(30), hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (25), hypotensive
LES (5), and poorly relaxing LES (33). None of the patients with
achalasia and scleroderma had normal bolus transit. Fifty-one percent
of patients with IEM and 55% of patients with DES had normal bolus
transit while almost all (more than 95%) patients with normal esophageal
manometry, nutcracker esophagus, poorly relaxing LES, hypertensive
LES, and hypotensive LES had normal bolus transit. Dysphagia occurred
most often in patients with incomplete bolus transit on MII testing.
CONCLUSION: Esophageal body pressures primarily determine bolus
transit with isolated LES abnormalities appearing to have little
effect on esophageal function. MII clarifies functional abnormalities
in patients with abnormal manometric studies.
|
| |
| ^ |
| |
| Diffuse
esophageal spasm: not diffuse but distal esophageal spasm (DES).
Sperandio
M, Tutuian R, Gideon RM, Katz PO, Castell DO.
Department
of Medicine, Graduate Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2003 Jul;48(7):1380-4.
Diffuse
esophageal spasm is an uncommon motility disorder that is found
in less than 5% of patients undergoing esophageal motility testing
for dysphagia. It is defined manometrically by the presence of 20%
or more simultaneous contractions in the distal esophageal body
with normal peristalsis. This motility abnormality has been traditionally
identified as occurring primarily in the smooth muscle portion of
the distal esophagus yet, the term "diffuse" persists
in the medical literature to identify DES. The aim of our study
was to assess the diffuse or limited nature of this entity by evaluating
the prevalence of simultaneous contractions in both proximal and
distal esophagus in patients with DES. We reviewed esophageal motility
tracings of 53 consecutive patients (32 F, 21 M) with DES and compared
them with 53 age-matched patients with manometric normal studies.
In the distal esophagus we found 195 simultaneous contractions (37%
of swallows) with a median of 3 and range of 2-7 per patient. Of
the 53 patients with DES a total of 13 simultaneous contractions
(2% of swallows) occurred in the proximal esophagus with only 3
(5.6%) of the 53 patients having 2 or more simultaneous contractions
in 10 swallows. None of the patients with normal manometry showed
more than one simultaneous contraction in either proximal or distal
esophagus. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the term diffuse
esophageal spasm is a misnomer and the DES is more appropriately
described as "distal" esophageal spasm.
|
| |
| ^ |
| |
| Twenty-four
hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter
report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers.
Shay
S, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, Vela M, Wise J, Balaji N, Zhang X, Adhami
T, Murray J, Peters J, Castell D.
Department
of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1037-43.
OBJECTIVES: Impedance monitoring is a new diagnostic method for
gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) where multiple impedance
electrode pairs are placed on a standard pH catheter. It detects
reflux of a liquid and/or gas bolus into the esophagus, as well
as its distribution, composition, and clearing. The aim of this
collaborative study is to define normal values for 24-h ambulatory
simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring (24-h Imp-pH), and compare
bolus parameters by impedance monitoring to changes in [H(+)] measured
by pH monitoring. METHODS: Sixty normal volunteers without GER symptoms
underwent 24-h Imp-pH with impedance measured at six sites (centered
at 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, and 17 cm above lower esophageal sphincter) and
pH 5 cm above the LES. Reflux detected by impedance was characterized
by the pH probe as either acid, weakly acidic, nonacid, or superimposed
acid reflux. Proximal reflux was defined as reflux that reached
the impedance site 15 cm above the LES. RESULTS: Reflux frequency
was common upright (median-27, 25th and 75th quartile-16, 42), but
rare recumbent (median-1; 0, 4). A median of 34% (14%, 49%) of upright
reflux reached the proximal esophagus. There was a similar number
of mixed composition (liquid + gas; 49%) and liquid-only reflux
(51%). Acid reflux was two-fold more common than weakly acidic reflux
(p < 0.001). Superimposed acid reflux and nonacid reflux were
rare. Acid neutralization to pH 4 took twice as long as volume clearance
measured by impedance. CONCLUSIONS: Combining impedance and pH monitoring
improves the detection and characterization of GER. This study characterizes
the frequency, duration, and extent of reflux in health and provides
normal values for 24-h Imp-pH for future comparison with GERD patients.
|
| |
| ^ |
| |
| Chronic
functional constipation in adolescents: clinical findings and motility
studies.
Zaslavsky
C, De Barros SG, Gruber AC, MacIel AC, Da Silveira TR.
Gastroenterology
Post Graduate Program, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal
do Rio Grande do Sul and the Gastroenterology Service, Hospital
de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Ramiro Barcelos 910/1003 Porto
Alegre, RS, Brazil.
carlos.zaslavsky@hmv.org.br
J Adolesc Health. 2004 Jun;34(6):517-22.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the clinical findings and colonic transit time in adolescents
with chronic functional constipation. METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive
adolescents with chronic functional constipation referred to the
Gastroenterology Service at the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre,
Brazil were studied. Clinical parameters were assessed using a questionnaire.
Total and segmental colonic transit time were measured with radiopaque
markers. RESULTS: Mean age at first visit was 14 +/- 2 years, and
age at onset of constipation was 6 +/- 4 years; 90% of patients
depended on laxatives, and 86% on intermittent enemas; 76% had a
family history of constipation. There was no statistical difference
in the amount of daily fiber ingested by patients and controls.
Measurements of colonic transit time revealed that 60% of patients
had slow transit constipation, 13% had pelvic floor dysfunction,
10% had slow transit constipation associated with pelvic floor dysfunction,
and 17% had a normal colonic transit time. Decreased frequency of
evacuation and palpable abdominal fecal mass were significantly
associated with slow transit constipation. CONCLUSIONS: Functional
constipation in adolescence consists of a heterogeneous group of
colonic functional disorders. The identification of these different
functional disorders in adolescents will guide specific treatment,
which may prevent the progression of this symptom into adult life.
|
| |
| ^ |
| |
| |
| Anorectal
manometric evaluation of children and adolescents postsurgery for
Hirschsprung's disease.
Zaslavsky
C, Loening-Baucke V.
Hospital
da Crianca Santo Antonio and Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente
Vargas, Porto Alegre, Brazil; carlos.zaslavsky@hmv.org.br
J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Feb;38(2):191-53.
BACKGROUND:
Little is known about anorectal function in patients after surgery
for Hirschsprung's disease. Therefore, the authors evaluated anorectal
sphincter function after corrective surgery. METHODS: Thirty-five
patients were studied after corrective surgery for Hirschsprung's
disease. Sixteen of them had anorectal manometry performed also
before surgery. The clinical outcome, the highest anal resting pressure,
the presence of the rectosphincteric reflex (RSR), and of high amplitude
propulsive waves were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 89% were doing
poorly. Three had a fair and only one had a good outcome at the
time of manometry 4.4 years after corrective surgery. RSR was absent
in 33 and abnormal in 2 patients. The preoperative anal resting
pressure was 45 +/- 14 mm Hg and postoperatively 45 +/- 13 mm Hg
(P >.3). The anal resting pressure was 44 +/- 16 mm Hg in the
19 patients evaluated only postoperatively. Propulsive waves >
or =50 mm Hg were present in 60% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Four
years postsurgery, patients had a persistent absence of RSR regardless
of the type of surgery. There was no significant difference in anal
resting pressure between patients with and without sphincterotomy
or between different surgical procedures. The presence of propulsive
waves was not a prognostic indicator for achieving bowel control.
Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
|
| |
| ^ |
| |
| |
| |
| ^ |
| |
| |
| Brasil recebe campanha inédita para conscientizar população sobre saúde e distúrbios digestivos .
No dia 29 de maio (Dia Mundial da Saúde Digestiva), o Brasil recebeu a campanha nacional de conscientização “Nutrição para Saúde Digestiva”. A iniciativa faz parte da ação global da Organização Mundial de Gastroenterologia (WGO), com apoio no Brasil da Federação Brasileira de Gastroenterologia (FBG) e parceria mundial da Danone para marcar a data, celebrada pela primeira vez no País.
Na data também foi lançado o mapa mundial das desordens e doenças digestivas, com dados epidemiológicos de 50 países. Para ampliar o alcance da iniciativa, a campanha contará com um hotsite (www.saudedigestiva.com.br), que reunirá informações sobre a saúde e os distúrbios digestivos, dicas de alimentação, pesquisas sobre o tema, teste de avaliação do funcionamento do intestino, entre outros dados.
A Campanha foi realizada simultaneante, em três capitais brasileiras (São Paulo, Belo Horizonte e Porto Alegre), com objetivo de disseminar informações sobre os distúrbios digestivos, e o impacto da nutrição na saúde.
|
| |
| ^ |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:: EVENTOS
Saiba onde serão os próximos Eventos Nacionais e Eventos Internacionais sobre Motilidade Digestiva!
IX SEMANA BRASILEIRA DO APARELHO DIGESTIVO

Dias: 21, 22, 23, 24 e 25 de Novembro de 2010
Local: Florianópolis - SC
|
|
|
:: LANÇAMENTO
FISIOLOGIA ANORETAL é lançamento da Editora Rubio que leva assinatura da Dra. Lucia Camara Castro Oliveira, que apresenta com diversos conteúdos para o especialista do aparelho digestivo. Organizados por temas específicos a obra destaca a motilidade como um todo com a cobertura dos principais assuntos da fisiologia anoretal. |
|
|
:: RESUMO DE TESES
PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING PENUMATIC DILATATION AND LAPAROSCOPIC MYOTOMY IN IDIOPATHIC ACHALASIA – PRELIMINARY RESULTS. Saiba mais. |
|
|
 |
ASSOCIE-SE
À SBMD
Conheça as vantagens de associar-se à SBMD. Além
de manter-se informado você obtém descontos em cursos e eventos
promovidos pela Sociedade.
|
|
|
 |
RELAÇÃO
DE ASSOCIADOS
Consulte nossa relação de associados e troque informações
com quem já faz parte deste grupo.
|
|
|
|